News & Views
Debt for climate
According to the latest economic research from Atradius (www.atradius.co.uk), a debt-for-climate approach could be one way to offset the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic while supporting developing countries to tackle climate change.
In the report, Atradius found that many developing countries are facing a triple crisis in 2022. The impact of the pandemic is being felt across the globe, but particularly in small island economies which have historically been heavily reliant on tourism. For these areas existing debt vulnerabilities have been aggravated by the pandemic, and with global travel restricted, many of these economies have struggled to survive over the past two years.
Many of the economies hardest hit by the pandemic are also some of the most vulnerable to the impact of climate change. But, due to fiscal constraints caused by high levels of debt, these island economies often can’t afford to invest in the climate-friendly solutions that would ultimately serve to benefit them in the longer term.
For some, the G20 Debt Service Suspension Initiative (DSSI) will have provided some temporary relief to help mitigate the impact of COVID-19. However, Atradius reports that following the expiration of DSSI at the end of 2021, many lower income countries are facing a crisis and the Common Framework may not go far enough to support some struggling economies.
Atradius reports that one solution to these dual problems could be a so-called ‘debt for climate swap’. This would see the international community provides debt relief for low-income countries in exchange for investments in climate solutions.
“Debt for climate is an interesting approach to supporting low-income and developing countries with international funds in a way that is mutually beneficial for both debtor and creditor,” says Damien Dawson, Regional Manager, Atradius UK. “Many of these lower-income countries have low carbon footprints, but despite having made little contribution to rising global temperatures they are set to be some of the worst impacted.”
However, despite many positives, debt for climate swaps aren’t without their challenges. Atradius highlights several challenges participants need to overcome for the swap to be successful. A swap needs to create maximum fiscal space for a debtor country to push forward to a more climate resilient economy and greener growth, and all its creditors will need to be on board with the initiative.
“Any debt relief needs to create sizable room for the debtor country to increase its spending on climate initiatives,” continues Dawson. “For countries with significant debt, a ‘topping up’ of the relief may be necessary over time to provide and maintain the room for climate spending. A successful deal relies on good governance of the debtor country, with insurance that the funds will be used for the agreed goals.”
“Although there are challenges to overcome, debt for climate swaps could become an attractive tool for both debtors and creditors. Previous swaps have taken place on a relatively small scale, given the number of parties involved it could take some time to implement anything on a bigger scale. The benefits of addressing the impacts of the pandemic and climate change in one solution could be significant on an international scale.”
As Dawson points out, “It’s important to remember that debt for climate isn’t a new phenomenon. We saw debt for nature swaps take place as early as the 1980s when Bolivia and an NGO signed the first agreement to tackle deforestation in return for debt relief. The first debt for climate swap took place in 2016 between the Seychelles and Paris Club creditors.”